I can't help but feel frustrated when I see Android apps adopting Apple's Liquid Glass design. It's like they're trying to be something they're not, and it's killing the unique Android experience.
Android has always been about customization and freedom, so it's understandable that some third-party launchers offer Liquid Glass-like designs. However, when app developers choose Apple's design language over Google's Material 3 Expressive as the default, it creates a jarring and unfamiliar experience for Android users.
The Battle for Design Identity
Some apps are taking this trend to the extreme, and it's becoming increasingly noticeable. Take Obsidian, a popular note-taking app, for example. Its recent update screams iOS with its circular floating buttons, lack of color, and a UI that feels more at home on an iPhone than an Android device.
While Obsidian's performance is commendable, a few simple changes could make a world of difference. For instance, altering the shape of the floating buttons to a squished circle, removing shadows, and embracing the flat design commonly seen on Android would go a long way in making the app feel more native.
Google's Material design language offers a vibrant and customizable experience, and app developers should take advantage of this. Imagine being able to apply your device's Material You color system to your favorite apps, like Obsidian. This would allow for a truly personalized and consistent Android experience.
Telegram's Design Dilemma
Telegram, another popular app, seems to be torn between Liquid Glass and its own design language. Its recent Android app overhaul leans heavily on iOS design elements, creating a confusing and inconsistent user experience.
Telegram is known for its beautiful animations and well-designed UX, so this mix of design choices feels like a step backward. If a company wants to create its own design system, that's great, but it should be a cohesive and unique experience, not a mishmash of Apple and Google's designs.
The Power of Brand Identity
On the other hand, companies like Robinhood have successfully created their own design systems, providing a consistent brand identity across platforms. Robinhood's apps, for instance, have a distinct and recognizable design, free from any Apple or Google influences.
Developing a custom design system requires significant resources, which is why many developers opt for platform-provided components. However, when done right, a custom design can enhance a company's brand and provide a unique user experience.
A Plea for Android Love
I understand that cost-cutting measures are important for businesses, but Android users deserve more attention and love. When Google unveiled Material 3 Expressive, it showcased bold and exciting design possibilities. Yet, a year later, we're still waiting for apps to embrace this evolved design language.
Material 3 Expressive has immense potential, and I hope developers recognize this and create truly expressive and Android-centric apps.
What are your thoughts on this design debate? Do you prefer a consistent design language across platforms, or do you appreciate the unique experiences each platform can offer? Let's discuss in the comments!
